What does the Edwards Rule dictate during an interrogation?

The Edwards Rule is a legal mandate stemming from the U.S. Supreme Court case Edwards v. Arizona, which established that if a suspect expresses a desire to have counsel present during an interrogation, all questioning must cease until an attorney is provided. This rule is designed to protect a suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and ensures that their right to legal representation is respected.

When a suspect invokes their right to counsel, any subsequent interrogation without the presence of an attorney is considered involuntary and may render any obtained statements inadmissible in court. The rule balances the need for law enforcement to gather information with the constitutional rights of individuals being interrogated.

The other options, while they relate to interrogation procedures, do not encapsulate the main tenant of the Edwards Rule. Recording interrogations, informing suspects of their rights, and conducting interviews in private rooms are important practices but do not specifically address the requirement triggered when a suspect requests legal representation.