What constitutes a color of law violation?

A color of law violation refers specifically to actions taken by governmental officials that are executed under the authority of their position, which results in the deprivation of constitutional rights. When answering the question, the correct choice identifies that such a violation involves acting under color of law, demonstrating willful and wanton conduct, and violating constitutional principles.

This means that an individual in a position of authority, such as a police officer, engages in misconduct while performing their official duties, beyond what is legally permissible. This might involve abusing their power by enforcing laws or policies in a manner that infringes on an individual’s rights. The acceptance of this definition underscores the role of intent and the recognition of constitutional guarantees in determining a violation's legality.

In contrast, the other options do not encompass the full scope of what constitutes a color of law violation, failing to address the critical aspects of authority and intent in the enforcement of the law. Thus, the choice encapsulates not just the act itself but also the context and implications of such conduct within the framework of constitutional law.